Ruggles v. United States
United States Court of Claims
The Reporters'1 statement of the case: The allegations of the petition demurred to will be found stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Peelle, Ch. J".,
delivered the opinion of the court:
The question for decision arises on the defendants’ demurrer to the petition on the ground that the facts averred therein are not sufficient in law to constitute a cause of action.
Although the claimant omits to set forth in his petition, as required by the rules of the court, his letter of appointment and the action of the various departments having to do with his claim, still, for the purpose of the demurrer, his counsel in open court concedes that the same, as certified by the executive departments, may be considered; and so treating them…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex Parte Duncan N. HennenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Parsons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Lellmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1902
- Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1904
3Cited by8 opinions
- Baskin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
- Arthur B. Daub v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
- Arthur B. Daub v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
- Pierce v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
- Watson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.