Legal Opinion

Nicholas A. Stirone v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 3, 1965No. 14758_1PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.

This case is before us for the third time. After the conviction of the defendant for extortion under the Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C. 1951) 168 F.Supp. 490, which we affirmed on appeal, 262 F.2d 571 the Supreme Court reversed 361 U.S. 212, 80 S.Ct. 270, 4 L.Ed.2d 252, on the ground that evidence beyond the scope of the indictment had been admitted into evidence. The matter was remanded to the district court for a new trial. Appellant’s brief would have it that appellee errs in saying that the second trial was under the same indictment. According to appellant, “ * * * the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Fahy v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Houser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  4. Frank W. Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  5. Jensen v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API