Legal Opinion

Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC v. Millenium Holding Group, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 23, 2008No. 07 C 4543PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MILTON I. SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC (“Fusion”) has filed a three-count Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) against Millenium Holding Group, Inc. (“Millenium”), Richard Ham (“Ham”) and Carla Aufdenkamp (“Aufdenkamp”), labeling its contentions under the rubrics of “Alter Ego/Piercing the Corporate Veil” in Count I, “Indemnification” in Count II and “Attorneys’ Fees and Costs” in Count III. Fusion seeks a declaration of its right to recover attorneys’ fees and expenses it incurred both (1) while defending itself against a prior action…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Clyde Pugh v. City of Attica, Indiana, Attica Police Department, Attica Board of WorksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLCIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Ronald Lesch v. Crown Cork & Seal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. Razor v. Hyundai Motor AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC v. HamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. CF Entertainment, Inc. v. The Nielsen Company (US), LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  3. In re: Insulin Pricing LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API