Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC v. Millenium Holding Group, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MILTON I. SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC (“Fusion”) has filed a three-count Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) against Millenium Holding Group, Inc. (“Millenium”), Richard Ham (“Ham”) and Carla Aufdenkamp (“Aufdenkamp”), labeling its contentions under the rubrics of “Alter Ego/Piercing the Corporate Veil” in Count I, “Indemnification” in Count II and “Attorneys’ Fees and Costs” in Count III. Fusion seeks a declaration of its right to recover attorneys’ fees and expenses it incurred both (1) while defending itself against a prior action…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clyde Pugh v. City of Attica, Indiana, Attica Police Department, Attica Board of WorksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLCIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Ronald Lesch v. Crown Cork & Seal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Razor v. Hyundai Motor AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC v. HamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- CF Entertainment, Inc. v. The Nielsen Company (US), LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- In re: Insulin Pricing LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025