Legal Opinion
Williams v. Vulcan-Hart Corp.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided April 22, 1991No. C90-0312-L(B)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BALLANTINE, District Judge.
In this memorandum, the court addresses the motion of the plaintiffs to compel the production of portions of an affirmative action plan prepared by the defendants. The case involves charges of racial and employment discrimination brought under the Kentucky Civil Rights Act, KRS 344.-010. This court has diversity jurisdiction. For the reasons detailed below, the motion to compel will be granted.
In April of 1990, this action was brought by sixteen employees of Vulcan-Hart Corporation against both Vulcan-Hart and its parent corporation, Premark International,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1970
- Banks v. Lockheed-Georgia Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
- Hardy v. New York News Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Webb v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Textron, Inc.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1994
- Etienne v. Mitre Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
- Cloud v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- United States ex rel. Sanders v. Allison Engine Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Lawrence v. Paducah Center for Health and Rehabilitation LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022