Scrinopskie v. Meidert
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Prior to November, 1946, appellant, Izzy Scrinopskie, and appellee, Johnny Meidert, were partners, operating three liquor stores in the city of North Little Rock, known as “Mint Liquor Store,” “101 Liquor Store,” and “Pike Liquor Store.” This partnership was mutually dissolved and a dissolution agreement entered into November 26, 1946. Under the terms of this agreement, appellant acquired two of the liquor stores and appellee, Meidert, was paid $10,000 in cash and $8,000 in merchandise, and in addition, the agreement provided for the execution of a written lease from appellant to Meidert on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fort Smith Light & Traction Co. v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Williams v. ShaverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Hastings Industrial Co. v. CopelandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Leader Co. v. Little Rock Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Schnitt v. McKellarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Les-Bil, Inc. v. General Waterworks Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Meers v. Tommy's Men's Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
- Fulk v. GaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Williams v. CottenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.