Williams v. Cotten
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Judge.
This appeal arises from appellants’ action for specific performance, or, in the alternative, for return of $20,000 the appellants paid to appellee. Both below and on appeal, the parties have disputed the nature of the contract which was the basis for this action. The appellants, the Williams, contend the parties signed an offer and acceptance to purchase the appellee’s home; appellee, Cotten, contends they signed an option agreement whereby the Williams paid consideration for a nine-and-one-half month option to purchase Cotten’s home. The chancellor found that the parties had…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Black v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Andres v. AndresCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
- Schnitt v. McKellarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Swift v. ErwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Moore v. City of BlythevilleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bright v. GassCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
- Horton v. KonerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
- Maddox v. St. Paul School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
- Williams v. CottenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
- Vestal v. VestalCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989