Legal Opinion

Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. Perry

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 17, 2007No. A06-1235PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Following the death of Daniel Savage in early 2005, appellant Chong Suk Perry sought survivor’s economic loss benefits from Savage’s insurer, respondent Auto Owners Insurance Company. Respondent denied appellant’s request on the basis that she was not a survivor within the meaning of the insurance policy because she was not Savage’s “dependent.” Appellant sought arbitration, which the district court stayed after respondent filed a complaint in district court seeking a declaratory judgment to determine whether appellant qualified as a dependent. The district court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lobeck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Iverson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Knudsen v. TRANPSORT LEASING/CONTRACT, INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Colangelo v. Norwest Mortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API