Legal Opinion
The Central Trust Bank v. William Graves
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 2, 2016No. WD78757PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKaren King Mitchell, Presiding Judge
William Graves appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss or stay the litigation and compel arbitration with Central Trust Bank (Central), his former employer. Graves argues that Central is bound by the mandatory arbitration provision of Graves’s employment contract with IFC Holdings, Inc. (INVEST), either as a third-party beneficiary of that contract or by the doctrine of equitable estop-pel. We affirm.
Background 1
Graves was employed by" Central “to engage in marketing and sale of ... Investment Products,” which Central apparently acquired from INVEST..Graves was also…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Thomson-Csf, S.A. v. American Arbitration Association, Evans & Sutherland Computer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Dunn Industrial Group, Inc. v. City of Sugar CreekSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Vincent v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Nitro Distributing, Inc. v. DunnSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Menschik v. Heartland Regional Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Cerner Middle East Limited v. Icapital, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Marlon Granger v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- WILKIN v. MITCHELLCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2024
- Andrea M. Curns v. Phyllis AkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.