State v. Mimbach
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
This appeal is from a conviction for forgery, Minn.Stat. § 609.63, subd. l(5)(1984)(false entry falsifying a business document). Appellant Mark Mimbach was acquitted of attempted theft by false representation, Minn.Stat. § 609.52, subd. 2(3), and the trial court set aside his conviction for attempted theft by swindle, Minn.Stat. § 609.52, subd. 2(4). We reverse the forgery conviction.
FACTS
Appellant Mark Mimbach’s Ace Hardware store was burglarized on April 12, 1984. Sauk Rapids police discovered the rear door of the store was open at 3:00 a.m. Mimbach was called to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Gilbert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wayne S. Marteney v. United States of America, C. M. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- State v. MarkWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Sterling State Bank v. Virginia Surety CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Weigman v. Everest InstituteDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013