Boulware v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Souter
Sections 301 and 316(a) of the Internal Revenue Code set the conditions for treating certain corporate distributions as returns of capital, nontaxable to the recipient. 26 U. S. C. §§ 301, 316(a) (2000 ed. and Supp. V). The question here is whether a distributee accused of criminal tax evasion may-claim return-of-capital treatment without producing evidence that either he or the corporation intended a capital return when the distribution occurred. We hold that no such showing is required.
I
“[T]he capstone of [the] system of sanctions ... calculated to induce ... fulfillment of every duty under…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Kawashima v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Combs v. Roark Amusement & Vending, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
- David E. Watson, Pc v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. ColeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. PresbiteroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.