Legal Opinion

United States v. Presbitero

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 26, 2009No. 07-1129, 07-1610, 07-1712PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

A jury heard abundant evidence that although Presbítero Drywall Company’s tax returns contained deductions for payments to subcontractors, the subcontractors did not exist. The jury also heard that the company’s owner, Ronald Presbítero, and construction superintendent, Joe Velasquez, went to great lengths to perpetuate the fiction, even having checks made out to the non-existent subcontractors that were cashed every week. Because we conclude a rational jury could have concluded that one reason both Presbítero and Velasquez attempted to make up the subcontractors was…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Calderon v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. David J. Scott v. Patrick Churchill, Inspector, Carson City Regional Facility, Philip BairCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. PansierCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. HillsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API