Legal Opinion

Winter v. Meier

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 22, 1909No. Gen. No. 14,665PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Assumpsit. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. W. W. Maxwell, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1908.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

The original statement of plaintiff’s claim filed in the Municipal Court is “for money lent by the plaintiff to defendant on or about the month of June, 1895, the sum of $400. ’ ’ By leave of court this statement of claim was amended by adding in form a count declaring upon four notes, one for $125 and three for $100 each, made by defendant, payable to the order of plaintiff, all dated February 1, 1897, and payable respectively February 1, 1898, 1899, 1901 and 1902, after date, with interest at six per cent per annum. The count…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Curtiss v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Hinckley v. AreySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1847
  3. Dawson v. BeallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  4. Rice v. London & Northwest American Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. Murphy v. HalleranAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thomas J. Lowrance v. Stephen J. HackerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Hempen v. GillenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  3. Kuhn v. KuhnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  4. Poray, Inc. v. Crescent Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  5. Winter v. MeierAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API