Poray, Inc. v. Crescent Industries, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE FEINBERG
delivered the opinion of the court.
In this action plaintiff sought to recover a balance claimed due for goods sold and delivered to defendant. The defense to the action is accord and satisfaction. There was a hearing without a jury, and upon a stipulation of facts the court entered judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $9,577.37, from which judgment defendant appeals.
It appears from the stipulation of- facts that on February 24, 1954, defendant filed its petition in bankruptcy for reorganization under the provisions of Chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act. Plaintiff…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Canton Union Coal Co. v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Curtiss v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
- Herman v. SchlesingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Lapp v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Day-Luellwitz Lumber Co. v. SerrellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thomas J. Lowrance v. Stephen J. HackerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989