Legal Opinion

Hinckley v. Arey

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 15, 1847PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Assumpsit on two promissory notes. The case was submitted on a statement of facts, as it was ■termed, setting out the testimony of witnesses, and the introduction of depositions, at a trial in the district court; and ■concluding thus: — “ The foregoing evidence being out, the case by consent was taken from the jury and submitted to the Court on the ■question, whether the facts proved constituted a good defence in law, each party reserving the right to appeal.

Read the full summary

Assumpsit on two promissory notes. The case was submitted on a statement of facts, as it was ■termed, setting out the testimony of witnesses, and the introduction of depositions, at a trial in the district court; and ■concluding thus: — “ The foregoing evidence being out, the case by consent was taken from the jury and submitted to the Court on the ■question, whether the facts proved constituted a good defence in law, each party reserving the right to appeal. The Court to render judgment by nonsuit or default.” The material facts proved by the evidence are given in the •opinion of the Court.…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Tenney J.

The action is upon two promissory notes of hand; and the defence is accord and satisfaction.

The defendant consulted N. Hubbard, Esq. as counsel relative to filing his petition to become a bankrupt. He was advised first to make an effort to compound with his creditors. He acted on that advice and empowered Mr. Hubbard to make an offer to the plaintiff in furtherance of that object; this was done, and an answer was returned by the plaintiff, in which he writes, “you say that Capt. Arey is going to pay his debts in that easy way without he can get…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wilson v. . Lewiston Mill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Finnerty v. FritzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879
  3. Herman v. SchlesingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Melroy v. KemmererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. Walker v. KeelingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API