Legal Opinion

City of Hazel Park v. Potter

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1988No. Docket 99886PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCynar, P.J.

Defendant, Dan W. Potter, appeals as of right from a March 25, 1987, order granting summary disposition in favor of the plaintiff, City of Hazel Park. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Defendant was employed as city manager for plaintiff for thirteen years. All of defendant’s contracts of employment between himself and plaintiff had been oral contracts brought by motion in the minutes of the city council meetings. On November 5, 1985, a majority of the city council was either defeated at the polls or retired. Between December 5, 1985, and December 31, 1985, the outgoing majority of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morin v. FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Hanon v. BarberMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Manley v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Town of Tempe v. CorbellArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Newman v. McCullough, MayorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Piedmont Public Service District v. CowartCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Adams Outdoor Advertising v. East LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Domako v. RoweMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Grebner v. Clinton Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Norgan v. American Way Life InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API