Legal Opinion

Boyd v. City of Montgomery

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 24, 1987No. Civ. 5778PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The trial court held the plaintiff (Boyd) was not an employee of the defendant (City) at the time of her injury and therefore not entitled to workmen's compensation benefits.

The issue is whether an injury sustained while "trying-out" for a position with the City is compensable as a job-related accident. In other words, was Boyd an employee of the City at the time she was injured?

The record shows that Boyd applied with the City for employment with the police department. She was subsequently notified of her eligibility to test for admission to the police academy. She passed a written exam, but…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Laeng v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Reed v. Ridout's Ambulance, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Carraway Methodist Hospital, Inc. v. PittsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. Alabama Great Southern R. R. v. BurksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Younger v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Leslie v. School Services & Leasing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Dodson v. Workers' Compensation DivisionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Standring v. Town of SkowheganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  5. Bugryn v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API