Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Nespelem Consolidated Mines, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1943No. 29005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

Plaintiff, by counsel other than that now representing him, commenced an action November 24, 1939, to recover against Nespelem Consolidated Mines, Inc., seventeen hundred dollars for services rendered as caretaker of the property of defendant, and prayed that, as defendant corporation was insolvent, had no income, and had no assets other than its mining property, a receiver be appointed for defendant. February 26, 1940, the court entered an order appointing one Glenn E. Cunningham (who duly qualified) as receiver of and for defendant corporation with power, under the control and subject to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re the Dissolution of New Jersey Refrigerating Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bown v. FleischauerWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Bown v. FleischauerWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Bown v. FleischauerWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Garrett v. Nespelem Consolidated Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API