Faribault v. Northern States Power Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
DIBELL, Justice.
Action to recover damages for death by wrongful act. The court directed a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The plaintiff’s intestate was working for a house-mover and was killed by an electric shock from high tension wires of the defendant strung on poles along the roadway when helping get the house from the roadway onto the adjoining land.
It is the rule that one making use of electricity must exercise an amount of care commensurate with the danger involved. The degree of care is properly defined as ordinary care;…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Musolf v. Duluth Edison Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Bunten v. Eastern Minnesota Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Gilbert v. Duluth General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Hoppe v. City of WinonaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mares v. New Mexico Public Service Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Ekdahl v. Minnesota Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Greenwald v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Anderson v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- McCormick v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.