Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Lincare Inc.

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided August 24, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00109Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION JILLIAN WATKINS, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 3:22-cv-00109 LINCARE, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending is Defendant Lincare Inc.’s (“Lincare”) Motion to Compel Discovery Responses from Plaintiff Jillian Watkins. (ECF No. 134). Plaintiff filed a Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion to Compel, (ECF No. 143), and Lincare has replied. (ECF No. 145). Therefore, the matter is fully briefed, and oral argument will not be necessary to resolve the dispute. This case involves the alleged…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carney v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  2. Lynn v. Monarch Recovery Mgmt., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
  3. Lakehead Pipe Line Co. v. American Home Assurance Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
  4. Kosta v. ConnollyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Foretich v. ChungDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API