Legal Opinion
In re Manhattan Piggly-Wiggly Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 19, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REARNED HAND, District Judge.
The cause is thus: The receiver was appointed and took possession of the assets on November 18, 1922, among which was a lease executed between the bankrupt and petitioner. The rent was payable monthly in advance, and the lease contained the usual condition of re-entry for breach of the covenant to pay rent. The bankrupt did not pay the rent falling due on November 1st, but the lessor took no steps to re-enter, either before or after the entry of the receiver, nor did he make an agreement with the latter respecting his occupation. Eventually he demanded the rent as…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Oscar Heineman Corporation v. Nat Levy & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Central Manhattan Properties, Inc. v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- In Re Sturgis Iron & Metal Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- In Re Universal Medical Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- In Re Buttonwood Securities, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.