Legal Opinion
Oscar Heineman Corporation v. Nat Levy & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 6, 1925No. 283PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
This ease relates to the liability of equity receivers to pay for the use and occupation of premises. It appears that on May 14, 1924, the complainant began an action against the defendant, in which action Franck C. Fisher and Nat Walkof were appointed receivers of the property of the defendant. The receivers immediately took possession oi the premises occupied by the defendant, and continued in possession of such premises for a period of 41% days. The premises were held under a lease executed by the Liberty Place Holding Corporation to the defendant, and in which the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- United States Trust Co. v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Quincy, Missouri & Pacific Railroad v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Sparhawk v. YerkesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Woodruff v. . Erie Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- American Anthracite & Bituminous Coal Corp. v. Leonardo Arrivabene, S.A., Tramp Tankers Corporation of Liberia and Estate of Hector C. DracoulisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Palmer v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- S & W Holding Company v. Julius Kuriansky, Trustee, in the Matter of W. L. Boffa, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- In Re United Cigar Stores Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- In Re Chase Commissary CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.