Legal Opinion

In re Claude D. Convisser

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 2018No. 18-BG-626Published

1Per curiam

On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Court of New Mexico suspending respondent from the practice of law in that state for a period of one-year, with the suspension fully stayed; the June 12, 2018, order of this court directing respondent to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; respondent's response; the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline; and the lodged reply by respondent, it is

ORDERED, sua sponte , that respondent's lodged reply to Disciplinary Counsel's statement regarding reciprocal discipline is filed. It is

FURTHER…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re SibleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. In Re FullerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. In re ChagantiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API