Clevidence v. Wayne Savings Community Bank
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GWIN, District Judge.
On March 26, 2001, Defendant Wayne Savings Community Bank (“Wayne Bank”) filed a motion for summary judgment (Doc. 23). Plaintiff Deborah Clevidence opposes the motion. For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
I. Background
In this case, Plaintiff Clevidence alleges that Wayne Bank fired her because of her sex and age in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq., and Ohio Rev.Code §§…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- William Grosjean v. First Energy Corporation Toledo Edison EnergyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Bush v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Raadschelders v. Columbus State Cmty. Coll.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Kindness v. Anthem, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021