Legal Opinion · Dissent

Holland v. Columbia Iron Mining Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1956No. 8237Published

1DissentWade, Justice

Plaintiff, Rex Holland, in his own behalf and as administrator with the will annexed of his father, John G. Holland’s estate, appeals from a summary judgment dismissing this action as to the corporate *316defendants. I cannot agree that the showing sustains such dismissal as to the defendant Columbia Iron Mining Company.

Appellant contends that defendant, Arthur E. Moreton, while acting as attorney and agent for appellant, his father and William C. Murie, in perfecting their title, obtaining a patent and arranging for the sale of their interests in three mining claims, concocted a plan or scheme…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  2. Peckham v. Ronrico CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
  3. Dale v. Thomas H. Temple Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. ErwinUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Kansas City v. RathfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API