Legal Opinion

Hill v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1933No. 24442. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blake, J.—

Plaintiff brought this action, praying for a writ of mandamus to compel defendant to restore him to the position of carpenter, and for compensation accruing to the position during the period he was wrongfully separated from it. The court below entered judgment ordering the writ to issue and for $931.29, the amount accruing to the position during the time plaintiff was denied its enjoyment. Defendant appeals.

Respondent entered the service of the appellant, as a carpenter, under civil service in 1911. Apparently, he was the first to attain civil service standing in such position, for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Allen v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Buchanan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Watkins v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Haga v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State Ex Rel. Thompson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API