Legal Opinion

Eastman Outdoors, Inc. v. Blackhawk Arrow Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 11, 2004No. 03-73394PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FEIKENS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The underlying action in this case is a patent infringement dispute between two sellers of archery arrows. After Plaintiffs filed suit and notified some of Plaintiffs’ customers of the pending litigation, Defendants filed a Counterclaim for Unfair Competition under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1525.

Now, Plaintiffs move to dismiss Defendants’ Counterclaim for Unfair Competition, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Fed. R:Civ.P. 12(b)(6), and in the alternative, for summary judgment on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Sharon Hageman, Admx. Of the Estate of Donald Hageman v. Signal L. P. Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. VanWulfen v. Montmorency CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  2. Myco Industries, Inc. v. Blephex, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API