Legal Opinion

United States v. Mays

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 28, 2003No. 02-5929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This is a direct appeal from a judgment denying a post-judgment motion to reduce or rescind a fine levied in a criminal judgment and commitment order. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

In 1994, James V. Mays was convicted by jury of twenty-eight separate counts stemming from his role in a scheme to manufacture and sell adulterated orange juice. The district court sentenced Mays to a 104 month term of imprisonment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. Lloyd D. WatrobaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. James v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nelms v. BrewerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  2. Nichols v. ChristiansenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API