Legal Opinion

Kroes v. American Family Insurance

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided February 23, 1993No. 91-1868PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCHLEGEL, Judge.

American Family Mutual Insurance Company challenges the district court’s ruling on the Kroes’s motion for declaratory judgment requiring American Family to pay attorney fees to its. insured’s attorney for services rendered in protecting American Family’s subrogation interests. On appeal, American Family contends it had already protected its subrogation interests through its own efforts with the other insurance carriers and therefore owes no attorney fees for the settlement agreement obtained by its insured.

American Family issued an automobile insurance policy .to the Kroeses.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of SteenhoekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. VoeltzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. Principal Casualty Insurance Co. v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ide v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API