Legal Opinion

Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Voeltz

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 23, 1988No. 87-1420PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

The determinative issue in this declaratory judgment proceeding is whether the baby-sitting activities of an insured under a homeowners policy were excluded by the “business pursuit” exclusion of the policy. The district court said they were not and required the insurer to defend and indemnify the insured against a suit for personal injuries suffered by an infant while in the care of the insured. We agree and affirm.

I. Background Facts And Proceedings.

In the latter part of August 1984 Andrew D. Voeltz and Tiara Voeltz made application for a mobile home property and liability…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. C & J Fertilizer, Inc. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  2. Rodman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  3. Hamilton v. WosepkaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co. v. RoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  5. Connie's Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Wilson v. IBP, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  3. Hendricks v. Great Plains Supply Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Allen v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Wolf v. WolfSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API