Legal Opinion
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Nedashkoyskiy
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 13, 2011No. A10-1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARKIN, Judge.
Appellants argue that the district court abused its discretion by denying their motion to stay an eviction proceeding. Because appellants did not provide the district court with a case-specific reason why a stay would be appropriate or otherwise necessary to protect their interests, we affirm.
FACTS
On April 7, 2004, appellants Peter and Nadezhda Nedashkovskiy provided a mortgage encumbering their property, legally described as Lot 7, Block 1, Bridge-water, Anoka County, Minnesota, to Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as nominee for Discover Mortgage…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Bionics Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Real Estate Equity Strategies, LLC v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Bjorklund v. Bjorklund Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Scroggins v. SolchagaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
3Cited by5 opinions
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Gary E. Mitchell, John DoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Brinkman v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Great Southern Bank v. Gustavo Aguilar GuzmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- The Bank of New York Mellon formerly known as the Bank of New York, as Trustee v. Anthony J. Tatro, Matthew JaakolaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014