Legal Opinion

State v. Stackhouse

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 3, 1998No. 15646-0-IIIPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*348Sweeney, J.

This is a first degree murder case. In response to Tobias Stackhouse’s motion in limine, the trial judge ruled there would be no mention and no evidence of another recent prior murder by Mr. Stackhouse in Pend Oreille County (Roscoe murder). The court found that such evidence would be highly prejudicial and serve no legitimate evidentiary purpose, i.e., motive, intent, opportunity. But the court later denied Mr. Stackhouse’s challenges for cause to two jurors who knew that he had been involved in the Roscoe murder. The question here is whether the refusal to excuse these two jurors…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Patton v. YountSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. Dennis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. State v. FraserCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API