Legal Opinion
State v. Melde
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 21, 2006No. A05-1553, A05-1604PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Chief Justice.
In these two cases, consolidated for review, the question is whether the Minnesota Implied Consent Advisory, Minn.Stat. § 169A.51, subd. 2 (2004), violates a driving-while-impaired (DWI) arrestee’s procedural due process rights because it fails to adequately notify the arrestee of the consequences of refusing to submit to chemical testing. The district courts concluded that the advisory violated appellants’ due process rights and dismissed the test-refusal charges. On appeal, the court of appeals reversed the dismissals of the test-refusal charges…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Raley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. CrawleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In re the Welfare of M.L.M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. HunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.