State v. Cox
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
This case involves a question certified to the court of appeals raising an equal-protection challenge to appellant’s prosecution under the dishonored-check statute, Minn. Stat. § 609.535 (2010). The dishonored-check statute provides in some circumstances for harsher penalties than the theft-by-eheck statute, Minn. Stat § 609.52, subd. 2(3)(i) (2010), and appellant relies on this disparity to support her equal-protection challenge. The court of appeals concluded that appellant had not established an equal-protection violation and answered the certified question in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rinaldi v. YeagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Tigner v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Miller Brewing Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Kathryn S. BarnhillSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Schatz v. Interfaith Care CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- McDonald v. City of Saint PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the CHILD OF R.D.L. and J.W., ParentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.