Peralta v. Vasquez
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CALABRESI, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents a new twist on a familiar issue: What requirements must a *100prisoner meet before he can maintain a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that challenges sanctions imposed pursuant to a prison disciplinary proceeding? The case law is clear that when a prisoner’s challenge either to the process or the result of a prison disciplinary proceeding necessarily implies the invalidity of a sanction that affects the duration of his sentence, such as the deprivation of good-time credits, the prisoner may not maintain an action under § 1983 unless he has shown that the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Muhammad v. CloseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Frank McKithen v. Richard Brown, District Attorney, County of Queens, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Holland v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Lockett v. SuardiniCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Haywood v. HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Alexander Hebrard v. Jeremy NofzigerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.