Legal Opinion

Holland v. Goord

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 10, 2014No. 13-2694-PRPublishedCited by 197 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-Appellant Darryl Holland (“Holland”), an inmate and practicing Muslim, asserts that defendant prison officials Glenn Goord, Anthony J. Annuei, Anthony F. Zon, Thomas Schoellkopf, John Barb-era, and Martin Kearney collectively, (“Ap-pellees”) 1 unconstitutionally burdened his religious exercise when they ordered him to provide a urine sample within a three-hour window — the time limit then permitted by prison regulations — while Holland fasted in observance of Ramadan, the holy month during which Muslims refrain from ingesting food and drink during…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. O'Lone v. Estate of ShabazzSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Salahuddin v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by197 opinions

  1. Brandon v. KinterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. Kravitz v. PurcellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
  3. McGowan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  4. Hayes v. DahkleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  5. Holland v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016

192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API