Holland v. Goord
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Darryl Holland (“Holland”), an inmate and practicing Muslim, asserts that defendant prison officials Glenn Goord, Anthony J. Annuei, Anthony F. Zon, Thomas Schoellkopf, John Barb-era, and Martin Kearney collectively, (“Ap-pellees”) 1 unconstitutionally burdened his religious exercise when they ordered him to provide a urine sample within a three-hour window — the time limit then permitted by prison regulations — while Holland fasted in observance of Ramadan, the holy month during which Muslims refrain from ingesting food and drink during…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- O'Lone v. Estate of ShabazzSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Salahuddin v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by197 opinions
- Brandon v. KinterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Kravitz v. PurcellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- McGowan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Hayes v. DahkleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Holland v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.