Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gates v. . McCormick

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ActioN, tried before Ilarding, J., at June Term, 1918, of Scotland, upon this issue: Is plaintiff tbe owner of tbe lands described in complaint, or any part thereof; if so, what part? Answer: “No.” From tbe judgment rendered plaintiff appealed.

1DissentWalker, J.

Is plaintiff the owner of the lands described in complaint, or any part thereof; if so, what part? Answer: "No."

From the judgment rendered plaintiff appealed. Plaintiff claimed title under the McMillan grants and introduced evidence tending to locate said grants on the land in controversy and connected himself with the grantee by mesne conveyances. The claim of title by adverse possession under color seems not to have been supported and to have been abandoned, as there is no reference to it in plaintiff's brief. The defendants claimed title under two senior grants to John Gilchrist, one for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. Eureka Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Hall v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  3. Plummer v. . BaskervilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1840
  4. Burnett v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1852
  5. Perkins v. Brinkley.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. . StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. Spears v. RandolphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API