Legal Opinion

Pressler v. Wilke

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1892No. 7388PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Ho statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Associate Justice.

— Appellants Paul Pressler and Charlotte Pressler were husband and wife. The latter died, leaving appellee Frances Wilke her sole heir. At the time of her mother’s death Frances was a minor and unmarried. After the death of his wife appellant Paul Pressler filed in the County Court an inventory and appraisement of their community estate, and gave bond in accordance with the terms of the statute for the administration of that property.

This suit was brought by appellee Frances Wilke, who was joined by her husband, to recover of appellant Pressler as principal, and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Huppman v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. First Nat. Bank of HicoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Boedker v. BoedkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Milam v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. Citizens National Bank v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  5. Crawford v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API