Legal Opinion

Milam v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 7, 1902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Tarrant. Tried below before Hon. Irby Dunklin.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, Chief Justice.

In substance, as shown by the petition upon which the trial proceeded, this was a suit by appellant, the surviving widow "of B. R. Milam, deceased, against J. R. Milam, who was alleged to have duly qualified and to be acting as independent executor of the last will and testament of said B. R. Milam, and against R. F. Milam and the other appellees, all of whom were alleged to be the surviving heirs and devisees of said B. R. Milam, to establish her right and title to an undivided one-half of the community estate of appellant and B. R. Milam, and alleged to consist mainly…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. De La Vega v. LeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Roberts v. ConnelleeTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Huppman v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Woeltz v. WoeltzTexas Supreme Court · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stewart v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Kreis v. KreisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Nixon v. NixonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. Daggett v. W. B. Worsham & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Mauriceville Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API