Karamanos v. Egger
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Mr. Karamanos is an IRS agent classified at a GS-12 level. He spent much of his time on GS-13 work over several years. Finding this situation unfair, he applied for reclassification. In response, defendant Welcome transferred all GS-13 work away from Karamanos. Karamanos’ request for reclassification was not acted upon. *448He therefore appealed to the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which ruled that reclassification was inappropriate based on only a single GS-13 case, even though that case occupied most of Karama-nos’s time. OPM refused to reconsider this decision.
Havi…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schweiker v. ChilickySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jeffrey A. Saul v. United States of America Ray Larsen Colleen St. Louis John Doe St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Cameron E. Berry v. Gerson Hollander, Ted Galey, Perry Norman, W. Paul Nichol, and A.B. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Krueger v. LyngCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Ferry v. HaydenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Brothers v. CustisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.