Legal Opinion

Oliver v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1993No. 90-CF-184PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Senior Judge:

James Oliver (“Oliver”) was charged with possession of cocaine with intent to distribute; after a bench trial, he was convicted. Oliver challenges the trial court’s denial of his pre-trial motion to suppress evidence (cocaine) seized pursuant to a search which he contends was unconstitutional. In light of his previous encounter at Union Station with the same group of drug interdiction detectives, Oliver argues, his consent to the body search in this case was involuntary and thus invalid. On the particular facts of this case, we agree and therefore reverse the conviction.

On…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. WoodfolkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Ware v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Basnueva v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Nixon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Burton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API