Legal Opinion
United States v. Shah
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 1, 1974No. Crim. 73-284PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SNYDER, District Judge.
The Defendant, Himanshu C. Shah, was charged with a violation of the Wire Fraud Statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 1343. 1 The eleven count Indictment charged that during a period from on or about May 1, 1973, up to and including September 13, 1973, the Defendant made calls on specified dates from a telephone bearing the number 412-362-0613 in Pittsburgh to certain WATS (Wide Area Telephone Service) or “toll free” numbers throughout the country. After dialing the numbers, he would then, by means of an electronic device commonly referred to as a “blue box”,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alvin Bubis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. Charles v. GrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- United States v. GalloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Herman D. Brandon v. United States of America, Sylvester E. Gautreaux, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Michael William CleggCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Carol Ann Goldstein, United States of America v. Toby RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. James A. Harvey, A/K/A Ray Stewart, A/K/A Joseph R. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Melvin L. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Commonwealth v. HelmsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.