Legal Opinion

Jester v. Gray

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 20, 1920PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court. — Thos. A. Guthrie, Judge. Suit in equity for specific performance. The defense was predicated upon various grounds. There was a decree for the defendants, dismissing the petition*. The plaintiff has appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

I. Plaintiff’s suit is predicated upon the following written contract:

“For value received, we hereby grant to L. A. Jester or assigns, the exclusive right to purchase or sell the following described real estate, to wit: The north sixty (60) acres of the southwest quarter of Section thirty-two (32) in Township seventy-nine (79) in Range twenty-three (23), Polk County, Iowa. The. terms of this option are as follows: The total consideration to be paid for said land in case this option is exercised shall be thirty-seven thousand ($37,000.00) dollars, which shall be payable as follows: two…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Axe v. TolbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Hopwood v. McCauslandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HolubSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Ankeney v. BrentonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. Barnett v. LovejoySupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Von Knuth v. RyanNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. McCutchan v. Iowa State Bank of Fort MadisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API