Legal Opinion

City of Owatonna v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 19, 1923No. 23,507PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Plaintiff sued out an alternative writ of mandamus requiring defendant to install crossing gates where its tracks cross two streets of the city known as Rose street and Bridge street, and to provide operators at all times to attend to and operate such gates, or show cause why it should not do so. The writ recites that plaintiff is a city of about 8,000 inhabitants operating under a home rule charter; that defendant operates a line of railroad through the city and maintains therein a depot for receiving and discharging passengers and freight; that Rose street is the first street…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dexner v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  2. State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trumbull County Board of Education v. State Ex Rel. Van WyeOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State Ex Rel. Apple v. PenceOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Rose Brothers Lumber & Supply Co. v. ClousingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. State Ex Rel. City of Duluth v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. State Ex Rel. Brenner v. HodappSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API