Legal Opinion

Hodge v. Freeman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 4, 1961No. 42,020 and 42,054PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

The plaintiff’s petition in the court below contained two causes of action. The first sought to recover money due under a written contract entered into with one Jack Yetman on September 24, 1957, which was in part assigned to defendants Arthur T. Freeman, Albert Hayutin, Lyndon Gamelson and Earl Wakefield, for the purpose of managing, handling and promoting the plaintiff as an amateur and professional boxer and wrestler. The second sought to require the defendants to account to him for 50 percent of the net proceeds of “the gate” received by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miles v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Holmes v. KalbachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  3. Harmon v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Rockhill, Administrator v. TomasicSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. Baldwin v. FenimoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Venters v. SellersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. State v. FinicalSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. Materi v. SpurrierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  4. Vakas v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API