Legal Opinion · Dissent

Caruthers v. Kroger

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 2010No. SC S057678Published

1DissentDurham, J.

Petitioner has filed objections to the caption and summary in the Attorney General’s second modified ballot title. In my view, the objection to the second modified caption is well taken. For the reasons stated below, I would again refer the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification of the caption. Accordingly, I dissent from the majority’s decision to certify the second modified ballot title to the Secretary of State.

Initiative Petition 43 (2010), if adopted by the voters, would amend the Oregon Constitution by curtailing the authority of the Oregon legislature to establish…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Kain/Waller v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Greene v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Dale v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Caruthers v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API