United States v. Jones
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
Assigning one error, the failure of the trial court to instruct a verdict for it, the United States is here in a war risk ease urging that the judgment may not stand.
Based on a varicose condition of his left leg which has manifested various degrees of intensity during the thirteen years since he left the Army with it, the suit affirms that its disabling effects are total and permanent. The defense denies that they are. On this issue considerable testimony was taken.
For five or six years before the war, appellee had suffered from a varicose condition which, though it…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- United States v. KaminskyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Corn v. FlemmingDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1960
- United States v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- United States v. TateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- United States v. HooperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934