Legal Opinion

United States v. Haywood

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 10, 1934No. 7443PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Another war risk case in which appellee has had a verdict, and the government claims the evidence insufficient to sustain it, this case turns on whether the injury to the foot from which chronic osteomyelitis developed is, on the record, a total and permanent disability. The evidence does establish that appellee is and has been incapacitated from performing heavy manual labor which requires the constant use of his foot. It proves no more. Hindered by his wound in getting about and in doing his work, he has not been totally disabled by it. With the help of friends and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  3. United States v. VineyardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  4. O'Quinn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  5. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. TateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  2. United States v. ShashyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  3. United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API