Legal Opinion
Scofield v. Telecable of Overland Park, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 26, 1992No. Nos. 91-3014 through 91-3017PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, we are asked to interpret the subscriber privacy notice provisions and the remedial provisions of section 631 of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 (the “Act”), 47 U.S.C. § 551 (“section 551”). TeleCable of Overland Park, Inc. (“TeleCable”) and the plaintiffs below, Reid Scofield and Debbie D. Anderson (“plaintiffs”), appeal from a district court order granting in part and denying in part the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. See Scofield v. TeleCable of Overland Park, Inc., 751 F.Supp. 1499 (D.Kan.1990) (“Scofield”). The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Deepwater Investments, Limited v. Jackson Hole Ski Corporation and Paul M. McCollisterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Mary S. Smith v. Don Chapman, D/B/A Don Chapman Motor SalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- James v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- David Gambardella v. G. Fox & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. KennedyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Greisz v. Household Bank (Illinois)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Parker v. Time Warner Entertainment Co., LPDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Millennium Tga, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Metrovision of Livonia, Inc. v. WoodDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.