Lovell v. Duffey
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1DissentHelene N. White, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent. I conclude that the state court’s determination that Lovell’s trial counsel provided effective assistance was objectively unreasonable and *599would affirm the district court’s issuance of a writ.
“[T]he decision whether to plead guilty or contest a criminal charge is ordinarily the most important single decision in a criminal case ... [and] counsel may and must give the client the benefit of counsel’s professional advice on this crucial decision.” United States v. Gordon, 156 F.3d 376, 380 (2d Cir.1998) (quoting Boria v. Keane, 99 F.3d 492, 496-97 (2d Cir.1996), quoting…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Robert Moss (99-1951 01-1797) and Ronald Kohn (01-1610) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Gerald GordonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Phillip Griffin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.