State v. Martin
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS; Justice.
The defendant, Wilson Martin, appeals from his conviction and sentence for unlawfully possessing and having under his control a narcotic drug — three capsules of heroin — in violation of Act No. 14 of the Second Extra Session of 1934, as amended by Act No. 82 of 1938. The statute, as provided in section 25 thereof, is designated as the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act.
Subsequent to his conviction but prior to his sentence, defendant filed a motion in arrest, attacking the constitutionality of Act, No. 14 of the Second Extra Session of 1934. The trial judge sustained the motion,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Nigro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- State v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- State v. RugeroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- State v. LabatSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- State v. BirdsellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- State v. EubanksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- State v. SimienSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.